Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · AI Act

Article 43Conformity assessment

CELEX 32024R1689 · Read on 2026-08-18 · Chapter III

Share this page

Short answer

1. For high-risk AI systems listed in point 1 of Annex III, where, in demonstrating the compliance of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2, the provider has applied harmonised standards referred to in Article 40, or, where applicable, common specifications referred to in Article 41, the provider shall opt for one of the …

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-43 · Short answer as data · Official text

AI Act in short

Some AI uses are banned, high-risk AI requires risk management and human oversight, and deployers must ensure AI literacy.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. For high-risk AI systems listed in point 1 of Annex III, where, in demonstrating the compliance of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2, the provider has applied harmonised standards referred to in Article 40, or, where applicable, common specifications referred to in Article 41, the provider shall opt for one of the following conformity assessment procedures based on:

(a)

the internal control referred to in Annex VI; or

(b)

the assessment of the quality management system and the assessment of the technical documentation, with the involvement of a notified body, referred to in Annex VII.

In demonstrating the compliance of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2, the provider shall follow the conformity assessment procedure set out in Annex VII where:

(a)

harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 do not exist, and common specifications referred to in Article 41 are not available;

(b)

the provider has not applied, or has applied only part of, the harmonised standard;

(c)

the common specifications referred to in point (a) exist, but the provider has not applied them;

(d)

one or more of the harmonised standards referred to in point (a) has been published with a restriction, and only on the part of the standard that was restricted.

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

Other articles in this chapter

Knowledge card

Applies
provider: Carry out the applicable conformity assessment before placing on the market.
Risk if ignored
high
What to do
Carry out the applicable conformity assessment before placing on the market.
Deadline
Applies from 2 December 2027 for high-risk systems under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and from 2 August 2028 under Article 6(1) and Annex I (Article 113 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744).

card:eu:article:ai-act--art-43 · sha256 81bd93d9530f · Source: NovaCopilot

Obligations, actions and sanctions

  • Article 43 · Role: provider

    Carry out the applicable conformity assessment before placing on the market.

    Deadline: Applies from 2 December 2027 for high-risk systems under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and from 2 August 2028 under Article 6(1) and Annex I (Article 113 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744).

    Decision chain (JSON)

Sanction: Administrative fine: prohibited practices up to EUR 35 million or 7 % of worldwide annual turnover; other obligations up to EUR 15 million or 3 %; incorrect information up to EUR 7.5 million or 1 %. For general-purpose AI models the Commission (AI Office) decides, up to EUR 15 million or 3 %.

Summary of the obligation in the register; the official language versions on EUR-Lex are authoritative. Source: NovaCopilot

Risk, sanction and outcome

  • Art. 43 · provider

    Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine, högst EUR 15 000 000 · Authority: Market surveillance authority

    Decisions applying the provision: none in the register

    Full chain (JSON)

Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot

Recitals that carry the interpretation

The recitals in the preamble have no legal force of their own but often decide how the article is read. The links are curated against the official text. Read 2026-08-31.

  • Skäl 105 · Article 43

    Conformity assessment: for which high-risk systems self-assessment suffices and when a notified body is required.

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit