Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · AI Act

Article 48CE marking

CELEX 32024R1689 · Read on 2026-08-18 · Chapter III

Share this page

Short answer

1. The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set out in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-48 · Short answer as data · Official text

AI Act in short

Some AI uses are banned, high-risk AI requires risk management and human oversight, and deployers must ensure AI literacy.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set out in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.

2. For high-risk AI systems provided digitally, a digital CE marking shall be used, only if it can easily be accessed via the interface from which that system is accessed or via an easily accessible machine-readable code or other electronic means.

3. The CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly for high-risk AI systems. Where that is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of the high-risk AI system, it shall be affixed to the packaging or to the accompanying documentation, as appropriate.

4. Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 43. The identification number of the notified body shall be affixed by the body itself or, under its instructions, by the provider or by the provider’s authorised representative. The identification number shall also be indicated in any promotional material which mentions that the high-risk AI system fulfils the requirements for CE marking.

5. Where high-risk AI systems are subject to other Union law which also provides for the affixing of the CE marking, the CE marking shall indicate that the high-risk AI system also fulfil the requirements of that other law.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

Other articles in this chapter

Knowledge card

Applies
provider: Affix the CE marking visibly, legibly and indelibly to the high-risk AI system, or digitally for systems provided digitally.
Risk if ignored
high
What to do
Affix the CE marking visibly, legibly and indelibly to the high-risk AI system, or digitally for systems provided digitally.
Deadline
Applies from 2 December 2027 for high-risk systems under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and from 2 August 2028 under Article 6(1) and Annex I (Article 113 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744).

card:eu:article:ai-act--art-48 · sha256 b0bd9c65f712 · Source: NovaCopilot

Obligations, actions and sanctions

  • Article 48 · Role: provider

    Affix the CE marking visibly, legibly and indelibly to the high-risk AI system, or digitally for systems provided digitally.

    Deadline: Applies from 2 December 2027 for high-risk systems under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and from 2 August 2028 under Article 6(1) and Annex I (Article 113 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744).

    Decision chain (JSON)

Sanction: Administrative fine: prohibited practices up to EUR 35 million or 7 % of worldwide annual turnover; other obligations up to EUR 15 million or 3 %; incorrect information up to EUR 7.5 million or 1 %. For general-purpose AI models the Commission (AI Office) decides, up to EUR 15 million or 3 %.

Summary of the obligation in the register; the official language versions on EUR-Lex are authoritative. Source: NovaCopilot

Risk, sanction and outcome

  • Art. 48 · provider

    Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine, högst EUR 15 000 000 · Authority: Market surveillance authority

    Decisions applying the provision: none in the register

    Full chain (JSON)

Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit