Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · MiCA

Article 120Non-binding opinions of the colleges for issuers of significant asset-referenced tokens and significant e-money tokens

CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18

Share this page

Short answer

1. A college referred to in Article 119(1) may issue a non-binding opinion on the following:

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/mica-2023-1114/artikel-120 · Short answer as data · Official text

MiCA, crypto-assets in short

Crypto-asset service providers need authorisation, and issuers need a white paper. Stablecoins have special rules.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. A college referred to in Article 119(1) may issue a non-binding opinion on the following:

(a)

the supervisory reassessment as referred to in Article 117(3);

(b)

any decision to require an issuer of a significant asset-referenced token or a significant e-money token to hold a higher amount of own funds in accordance with Article 35(2), (3) and (5), Article 45(5) and Article 58(1), as applicable;

(c)

any update of the recovery plan or redemption plan of an issuer of a significant asset-referenced token or an issuer of a significant e-money token pursuant to Articles 46, 47 and 55, as applicable;

(d)

any change of the business model of an issuer of a significant asset-referenced token pursuant to Article 25(1);

(e)

a draft modified crypto-asset white paper drawn up in accordance with Article 25(2);

(f)

any envisaged appropriate corrective measures pursuant to Article 25(4);

(g)

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit