Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · AMLR

Article 34Scope of application of enhanced due diligence measures

CELEX 32024R1624 · Read on 2026-08-22

Share this page

Short answer

1. In the cases referred to in Articles 29, 30, 31 and 36 to 46, as well as in other cases of higher risk that are identified by obliged entities pursuant to Article 20(2), second subparagraph, obliged entities shall apply enhanced due diligence measures to manage and mitigate such risks appropriately.

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/penningtvatt-2024-1624/artikel-34 · Short answer as data · Official text

Anti-money laundering (AMLR) in short

Obliged entities must know their customers, identify beneficial owners and report suspicious transactions. Cash over EUR 10,000 is banned.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. In the cases referred to in Articles 29, 30, 31 and 36 to 46, as well as in other cases of higher risk that are identified by obliged entities pursuant to Article 20(2), second subparagraph, obliged entities shall apply enhanced due diligence measures to manage and mitigate such risks appropriately.

2. Obliged entities shall examine the origin and destination of funds involved in, and the purpose of, all transactions that fulfil at least one of the following conditions:

(a)

the transaction is of a complex nature;

(b)

the transaction is unusually large;

(c)

the transaction is conducted in an unusual pattern;

(d)

the transaction does not have an apparent economic or lawful purpose.

3. With the exception of the cases covered by Section 2 of this Chapter, when assessing the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing posed by a business relationship or occasional transaction, obliged entities shall take into account at least the factors of potential higher risk set out in Annex III and the guidelines adopted by AMLA pursuant to Article 32, as well as any other indicators of higher risk such as notifications issued by the FIU and findings of the business-wide risk assessment under Article 10.

4. With the exception of the cases covered by Section 2 of this Chapter, in cases of higher risk as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, obliged entities shall apply enhanced due diligence measures, proportionate to the higher risks identified, which may include the following measures:

(a)

obtaining additional information on the customer and the beneficial owners;

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

Knowledge card

Applies
obliged-entity: Apply enhanced due diligence measures in higher-risk situations.
Risk if ignored
critical
What to do
Apply enhanced due diligence measures in higher-risk situations.
Deadline
No fixed deadline in the register

card:eu:article:amlr--art-34 · sha256 071e379ce2f2 · Source: NovaCopilot

Obligations, actions and sanctions

  • Article 34 · Role: obliged-entity

    Apply enhanced due diligence measures in higher-risk situations.

    Decision chain (JSON)

Sanction: Administrative sanctions and measures decided by the supervisor under the AML Directive and national law.

Summary of the obligation in the register; the official language versions on EUR-Lex are authoritative. Source: NovaCopilot

Risk, sanction and outcome

  • Art. 34 · obliged-entity

    Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine, högst At least twice the benefit or EUR 1 000 000; credit and financial institutions EUR 10 000 000 or 10 % · Authority: AML supervisor

    Decisions applying the provision: none in the register

    Full chain (JSON)

Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
  • No sentence written by a language model
  • Engine version and read date on every answer
  • No customer data, no documents, no advice
  • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

Model cardAudit